The Protiviti View  | Insights From Our Experts on Trends, Risks and Opportunities

The Protiviti View

Insights From Our Experts on Trends, Risks and Opportunities
Search

POST

4 mins to read

What’s Your Equity Story? Going Public Will Either Reinforce It or Expose Its Cracks

Charles Soranno

Managing Director

Views
Larger Font
4 minutes to read

IPO readiness is not about checking a box, selecting bankers or rehearsing a polished roadshow. It is about proving that the company can withstand public-market scrutiny before the ticker symbol ever arrives.

That can be an uncomfortable truth for growth companies considering going public. As regulatory relief continues to lower some barriers, the IPO market is ripe, and mega deals may be back in the headlines. But none of that changes the fundamental truth: Investors are not buying a transaction; they are buying a story they believe will keep compounding.

In my recent conversation with Scott Dussault, seasoned public company CFO and a veteran of multiple IPO journeys, one message came through loud and clear: The equity story is paramount. Everything else — the vehicle, valuation, controls, governance and investor communications — either reinforces that story or exposes the cracks in it.

The equity story: Evidence, not marketing.

Public investors have limited patience for vague ambition. They want to understand why the market is large, why it is changing now and why a company has the right to win, Dussault says.

A credible equity story has three essential components:

1. A large addressable market that is ripe for disruption.

2. A differentiated solution validated by real customer use cases.

3. Sustainable growth vectors — new logos, expansion opportunities, product depth, pricing power and market reach.

The test is simple: Can leadership explain why the company will be more valuable several years after the IPO than it is on listing day? If the answer depends on slogans, momentum or market hype, the story is not ready.

Pressure-test the equity story before pressure-testing the valuation. Ask: What market are we disrupting? What proof do customers provide? What metrics show durable growth? What will investors say if growth slows?

The IPO vehicle is not the strategy

Too many companies debate the route to market before they understand the reason for going public, Dussault says.

A traditional IPO can provide growth capital, long-term institutional ownership and a powerful branding moment. A direct listing may work when the company does not need new cash. A merger with a SPAC (special purpose acquisition company) can offer more execution certainty, but it may bring volatility and overhang. Each path has trade-offs. None can rescue a weak equity narrative.

Business leaders should ask: Is the IPO about capital, brand, liquidity, acquisitions or credibility? Until management and the board agree on the purpose, they are not ready to choose the path.

Readiness must become muscle memory

IPO readiness is not a finance department project. It is an enterprise operating model. Companies should begin serious preparation 18 to 24 months before a potential listing because readiness is built through repetition, not 11th hour heroics.

That means tightening accounting and IT infrastructure, designing and testing controls, improving close processes and building FP&A capabilities that can support external expectations. The equity model is the numerical expression of the equity story. If the model cannot support the narrative, the narrative will not survive the roadshow.

Dussault described this preparation as “scrimmaging” — practicing the monthly and quarterly closes, the SEC filings, internal controls and forecasting cadence as if the company were already public. That is the right mindset. Public markets punish lack of ‘muscle memory’ and rehearsal gaps quickly.

  • Run public-company close simulations. Build speed, accuracy and confidence before the first quarter filing as a public company.
  • Scrimmage earnings guidance. Test whether forecasts are realistic, explainable and repeatable.
  • Cut weak KPIs. Keep only the measures that connect clearly to financial performance, reporting consistency and enterprise value.
  • Fix gaps early. Systems, controls, talent, data and cyber weaknesses grow more expensive under public scrutiny.

Cyber resilience has become a valuation issue

Public-company investors do not evaluate growth in isolation. They also evaluate operational risk. Weak technology systems, poor data controls and inadequate cybersecurity can undermine trust before a company ever reports its first public quarter.

The stakes are higher now. A cyber breach at a newly public company is not simply an IT incident. It can become a customer concern, a board matter, a disclosure challenge and a valuation problem. Cyber readiness needs to be embedded in the IPO plan, the audit committee agenda and the equity story itself.

Company executives should treat cyber resilience as a board-level readiness test. Identify where sensitive data lives, how incidents are escalated, which controls are tested and whether the board has the expertise to ask hard questions.

Meanwhile, valuation alignment should happen before the company is formally in market. Management, the board, investors and advisers need a defensible view of the peer group, the growth algorithm and the metrics that will shape investor perception.

Governance must mature before the market forces it to

Private-company governance often reflects private-company priorities. Public-company governance must reflect investor trust. That means clearer disclosure discipline, defined spokespeople, independent board members, functioning audit and compensation committees, and directors who can challenge management constructively.

Culture also has to shift. A newly public company cannot communicate like a private company with a broader audience. It is not that simple. It must communicate with consistency, restraint and repetition. If leaders say something only once, they have not said it enough. If they introduce a metric, they should be prepared to keep explaining why it matters.

The hard truth for business leaders

The IPO is not the exit. It is the opening act. The work that creates investor confidence before the offering must continue after it — in earnings calls, investor meetings, analyst conversations, boardrooms and operating reviews.

For business leaders, the mandate is clear: Start earlier. Tell a sharper story. Build the operating discipline to support it. Modernize systems. Strengthen cyber resilience. Align on valuation. Upgrade governance. Scrimmage public-company life before the market becomes the referee.

Bottom line: The market does not reward companies for going public. It rewards companies that are prepared to be public.

 

Watch the full interview with Scott Dussault here. For more information on Protiviti’s Private Equity practice and services, visit here.

Was this post helpful to you?

Thanks for your feedback!

Subscribe to the Tech Insights Blog

Stay on top of the latest technology trends to keep your business ahead of the pack.

In this Post

Authors

Charles Soranno

By Charles Soranno

Verified Expert at Protiviti

Charles is a Managing Director in New York with extensive experience in IPOs, technical accounting and SEC reporting,...

EXPERTISE

No noise.
Just insights.

Subscribe now

Related posts

5 mins to read August 27, 2026